Wim van Binsbergen, Confronting the sacred: Durkheim vindicated,
Hoofddorp: Shikanda Press, 567 pp, , ISBN 978-90-78382-33-1
to be distributed by Amazon.com, and meanwhile available from the present
website
click here for the text of the front and back covers
Table
of contents
click on the hyperlinks to access the relevant section of the book
List of special topics treated in the footnotes······· 23
0.1. Background, genesis, and general structure of
this book
Part I. Durkheim’s religion theory and its background...................... 45
1.2. Durkheim against the background of his time and age
1.2.1. Durkheim’s political views
1.3.3. Durkheim’s sociology of knowledge
1.3.4. On
primitive classification
1.3.7. Durkheim and other philosophers
1.3.8. From
philosophy to sociology
1.4. Durkheim’s last major book: Les Formes Élémentaires
de la Vie Religieuse
1.4.2. Durkheim’s method in Les Formes
1.5. Early
reception of Les Formes
1.6. Commentators
upon Les Formes
in the course of the 20th c. CE and most recently
1.7. Where do we go from here?
Chapter 2. General
observations; the problem········· 99
2. 1. General
critical observations on Les Formes
2.2. The paired
concepts sacred / profane as central
to Durkheim’s religion theory
2.3. The ambiguity
of the sacred
2.4. The
problem: Is the sacred universal and
eternal?
2.4.1. Pickering on modern Great-Britain
2.4.2. Prades
on the continued heuristic value of Durkheim’s
religion theory
2.5. A note on
comparative religion
2.6. Durkheim’s attempts at operationalisation
of sacred / profane
2.6.1. Why Durkheim
considers (a) the bullroarers to be sacred
2.6.2. Why Durkheim
considers (b) the totemic representations to be sacred
2.6.3. WhyDurkheim
considers (c) the totemic species to be sacred
2.6.4. Why Durkheim
considers (d) the humans involved to be sacred
2.6.5. Why Durkheim
considers (e) the individual totems to be sacred
2.6.6.
Discussion: Durkheim’s operationalisation
of the sacred
3.2. Selected
specialists in the field of Australian societies
3.2.1. Australia
in the ethnographic literature
3.2.2. Durkheim reception in Australia
3.3. The war on
the sacred in 20th c. CE France
3.4.
Lévi-Strauss yet salvaging Durkheim’s analysis of totemism?
3.5.
Intermediate stock-taking
4.1.
Defectiveness of the paired concepts sacred
/ profane as analytical tools
4.2. The rise
and fall of structuralism in Amsterdam anthropology
4.3. Taking my distance from the paired concepts sacred / profane
Part III. Vindicating Durkheim through anthropological fieldwork..................... 171
5.1.1. Durkheim applied to North African social segmentation
5.2. Regional
and historical background
5.3.
Segmentation in Ḫumiriyya
today
5.6.
Segmentation and types of zyara
5.7. Local zyara in the valley of Sidi Mḥammad
5.8. Original and personal zyara in the village of Sidi Mḥammad
6.1. Intrinsic sacrality as a puzzle
7.1.
Introduction: The relevance of transcendence to our present argument
7.3.
Transcendence among the Nkoya
7.3.1. Daily life among the small circle of kinsmen
making up the village
7.3.2. The
intimate domain of sexuality
7.3.3. The acts
of the priest-healer (nganga)
7.3.5. The
humble prayer to the ancestors
7.3.6. The deep
forest, where hunters roam
7.3.7. The
name-inheritance ritual of ushwana
7.3.8. The
ritual of girl’s puberty initiation
7.3.10. The
modern Zambia state
7.3.11. The
‘World of the Whites’
7.3.12. The historic forms of veneration of the High God Nyambi
Part IV.
Vindicating Durkheim through long-range approaches.......... 251
8.1.
Introduction: A long-range perspective
8.2. The
archaeology of religion
8.2.1.
Selected common approaches in the archaeology of religion
8.2.2.
Burial as an indication of Neanderthal star-orientated religion?
8.2.3.
Current debates among archaeologists of religion
8.3.
Long-range comparative and historical linguistics
8.3.1. How
*Borean semantics is structured: Introducing ‘range
semantics’
8.3.2.
Methodological difficulties in the long-range linguistic reassessment of Durkheim’s
claims
8.3.3.
Sketching a *Borean life-world
9.2. Cultural universals as a problem; the
possible contribution from religion
9.3. Words suggestive of absolute difference
in *Borean
9.7. Evidence for the sacralisation of space
/ of the kin group, in *Borean?
9.8. Exploring the semantics of ‘purity’ /
‘dirtiness’, in prehistoric lexicons
9.9. Exploring the semantics of ‘prohibition’
and ‘taboo’ in prehistoric lexicons
9.10. Exploring the semantics of ‘soul /
body’ in prehistoric lexicons
9.11. Exploring the semantics of ‘spirit /
spiritual beings’ in prehistoric lexicons
9.11.2. Altered states of consciousness
9.12. Exploring the semantics of ‘God, High
God, gods’ in prehistoric lexicons
9.12.1. ‘God’ semantics in the Eurasiatic macrophylum
9.12.2. The ‘god’ semantics in other
macrophyla than Eurasiatic
9.13. Spiritual beings: The prehistoric emergence
of theistic beliefs
9.14. Why did theistic beliefs arise in Asia
c. 25-20 ka BP?
9.14.1. Evolution of mind and religious
transmission (Mithen)
9.14.2. The emergence of theistic religion,
conjoined with that of agriculture?
9.15. Magic, divination, sorcery
9.16. ‘Further instalments on the problem of
evil’: Indications of moral categories
in *Borean
9.17. Looking, beyond Durkheim, for selected further religious concepts in *Borean
Part V. Conclusion and
reference material................................................... 429
Chapter 12. Summary and
conclusion; envoy·············· 431
12.1.1. Merits and demerits of Les Formes as a social-scientific theory
of religion
12.1.2. This
book’s implicit levels of methodology and orientation
12.1.3. Apologies
and disclaimer: The dangers of interdisciplinarity
and of homelessness
12.2. Envoy: The
reality of religion, but beyond Durkheim
12.2.1. Thinking
about God and the universe